Tagasi otsingusse
Ghaedi & Yazdi, 2016

Bioerosion in the Miocene Coral fauna, Bashagard area, Western Makran Basin

Ghaedi, M., Yazdi, M.
DOI
DOI10.22067/paleos.v4i1.44170
Aasta2016
AjakiriIranian Journal of Paleontology
Köide4
Number1
Leheküljed45-64
Tüüpartikkel ajakirjas
Id50603

Abstrakt

Due to difficult access to Makran Basin, a few geological investigations have been performed so far. The successions of the Band-e-Chaker Unit in Tejek, Kermestann, and Irer sections were measured and studied. Bioerosion is frequently seen in the corals of the studied sections. Through this paper, we investigate on bioerosion and its related factors in carbonate coral-bearing parts of Band-e Chaker Unit in studied sections around Band-e Chaker Syncline with Burdigalian age. Tejek section is composed of pure limestone and Kermestan and Irer sections are mostly composed of marly limestone and clastic. Discussion and Conclusion Based on the presence of corals, foraminifera, and previous studies (McCall et al., 1994), the studied sections are attributed to Burdigalian. According to diverse coral morphotypes, these sections indicate shallowing upward trends. In the studied sections, the effect of bivalves and polychaetes (serpula worms) in bioerosion is more obvious. Serpula worms are often the first organisms that colonize the coral surfaces (Hutchings & Peyrot-Clausade, 2002). Trypanites sp. and honeycomb borings are the most observed serpula traces on corals. In lower parts of sections that are concordant with deeper parts, serpula worm borings are thicker in diameter in comparison with upper and shallower parts. The other trace fossil that could be seen in the sections is Gastrochaenolites sp. which is created by bivalves; these are less frequent than serpula worms and mostly are present in shallower parts of the sections. Beside nutrient level, different environmental factors such as oxygen and salinity can affect in bioerosion process. Clastic and siliciclastic inputs decrease water transparency and increase nutrient level; increasing nutrient level is concordant with decreasing large benthic foraminifera and enhancement of filter-feeders and encrusters and finally bioerosion (Morsilli et al., 2012). Bioerosion, encrustation, and abundance of bryozoa are the result of an increase in nutrient availability. Based on the mentioned notes, a nutrient condition in Tejek section is oligotrophic to slightly mesotrophic, and in Kermestan and Irer sections mesotrophic nutrient condition is identified. Size measurements of bioeroders show that increasing depth reduces the diameter and abundance of them. In this case, it seems that the dissolved oxygen in the water can play an important role in bioeroders’ diameter size.

Märkused

In arabic?
Viimati muudetud: 25.1.2025
KIKNATARCSARVTÜ Loodusmuuseumi geokogudEesti Loodusmuuseumi geoloogia osakond
Leheküljel leiduvad materjalid on enamasti kasutamiseks CC BY-SA litsensi alusel, kui pole teisiti määratud.
Portaal on osaks teadustaristust ning infosüsteemist SARV, majutab TalTech.
Open Book ikooni autor Icons8.