Bioerosion and encrustation: Evidences from the Middle ‒ Upper Jurassic of central Saudi Arabia
DOI | 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.07.016 |
---|---|
Aasta | 2017 |
Ajakiri | Journal of African Earth Sciences |
Köide | 134 |
Leheküljed | 466-475 |
Tüüp | artikkel ajakirjas |
Keel | inglise |
Id | 7103 |
Abstrakt
The Middle‒Upper Jurassic hard substrates of central Saudi Arabia displayed considerable signs of bioerosion and encrustations. They include organic (oysters, other bivalves, gastropods, corals and brachiopods) and an inorganic carbonate hardground that marks the boundary between the Middle JurassicTuwaiq Mountain Limestone and the Upper Jurassic Hanifa Formation. Traces of bioerosion in organic substrates include seven ichnotaxa produced by bivalves (Gastrochaenolites Leymerie, 1842), polychaete annelids (Trypanites Mägdefrau, 1932; Maeandropolydora Voigt, 1965 and Caulostrepsis Clarke, 1908), sponges (Entobia Bronn, 1837), acrothoracican cirripedes (Rogerella Saint-Seine, 1951), gastropods (Oichnus Bromley, 1981) and probable ?Centrichnus cf. eccentricus. The encrusting epifauna on these substrates consist of several organisms, including oysters, serpulid wora ms, corals and foraminifera. In contrast, the carbonate hardground was only bioeroded by Gastrochaenolite, Trypanites and Entobia. Epibionts on this hardground include “Liostrea Douville, 1904-type ”oysters, Nanogyra nana Sowerby, 1822 and serpulids. In general, bioerosion and encrustation are less diversified in hardground than inorganic substrates, indicating a long time of exposition of organic substrates with slow to moderate rate of deposition in a restricted marine environment. Both organic and inorganic commuinities are correlated with those of other equatorial, subtropical and temperate equivalents.